Livelaw

Home/Top Stories/

Centre Forms Committee To Examine Issues Of Queer Community As Per SC Judgment In Same-Sex Marriage Case

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
16 Apr 2024 9:38 PM

Share this

The Central Government has constituted a six-member committee to examine various issues relating to the queer community as directed by the Supreme Court in its judgement in “Supriyo v Union of India”.

The Committee is headed by the Cabinet Secretary and comprises the Secretaries of the Department of Home, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Legislative Department and the Department of Social Justice and Empowerment.

Also Read – BCI Raises Concerns About Rise In Low Quality Law Colleges, Appeals To Universities To Grant NOCs Only After Proper Evaluation

As per the Centre’s notification, the Committee may examine and submit recommendations on the following issues :

(i) measures to be taken by the Central Government and the State Governments to ensure that there is no discrimination in access to goods and services to the queer community;

(ii) measures to be taken such that queer community do not face any threat of violence, harassment or coercion;

(iii) measures to be taken to ensure that queer person are not subjected to involuntary medical treatments, surgeries, etc., including modules to cover mental health of queer persons;

Also Read – The Complete Supreme Court Annual Digest- 2023 [Part-VII]

(iv) measures to be taken to ensure that there is no discrimination in access to social welfare entitlements to queer persons;

(v) any other issues as deemed necessary.

In Supriyo v Union of India, a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court had refused to grant legal recognition for same-sex marriages observing that it was a matter for the Parliament to decide. The Court also refused to strike down the Special Marriage Act 1954 for not allowing registration of same-sex marriages. At the same time, the Court held that LGBTQIA+ couples should be protected from harassment.

Also Read – West Bengal Governor Agrees Before Supreme Court To Appoint 6 University VCs Recommended By State Government

The Court recorded the assurance of the Solicitor General that the Union Government will constitute a Committee chaired by the Cabinet Secretary for the purpose of defining and elucidating the scope of the entitlements of queer couples who are in unions.

The judgment authored by CJI DY Chandrachud stated that the Committee shall include experts with domain knowledge and experience in dealing with the social, psychological, and emotional needs of persons belonging to the queer community as well as members of the queer community. The Committee shall before finalizing its decisions conduct wide stakeholder consultation amongst persons belonging to the queer community, including persons belonging to marginalized groups and with the governments of the States and Union Territories.

CJI Chandrachud observed in his judgment that the Committee shall in terms of the exposition in this judgment consider the following:

i. Enabling partners in a queer relationship (i) to be treated as a part of the same family for the purposes of a ration card; and

(ii) to have the facility of a joint bank account with the option to name the partner as a nominee, in case of death; ii. In terms of the decision in Common Cause v. Union of India, as modified by Common Cause v. Union of India , medical practitioners have a duty to consult family or next of kin or next friend, in the event patients who are terminally ill have not executed an Advance Directive. Parties in a union may be considered ‘family’ for this purpose;

iii. Jail visitation rights and the right to access the body of the deceased partner and arrange the last rites; and

iv. Legal consequences such as succession rights, maintenance, financial benefits such as under the Income Tax Act 1961, rights flowing from employment such as gratuity and family pension and insurance.

The report of the Committee chaired by the Cabinet Secretary shall be implemented at the administrative level by the Union Government and the governments of the States and Union Territories, the judgment stated.

Click here to read the notification

Tags
LGBTQIASame Sex Marriage

Similar Posts

BCI Raises Concerns About Rise In Low Quality Law Colleges, Appeals To Universities To Grant NOCs Only After Proper Evaluation
Raising concerns about the increasing number of low-quality law colleges in India, the Bar Council of India has written to all university Vice Chancellors urging them to conduct thorough inspections before granting No Objection Certificates(NOCs) for new legal education centres.The BCI noted that while they play a regulatory role, universities and…

The Complete Supreme Court Annual Digest- 2023 [Part-VII]
Consumer Law A pedantic and hyper-technical approach would cause damage to the very concept of consumerism. (Para 23) Alpha G184 Owners Association v. Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd., 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 442 : AIR 2023 SC 2527 Amend Consumer Protection Rules on appointment process of commission members within 3 months :…

West Bengal Governor Agrees Before Supreme Court To Appoint 6 University VCs Recommended By State Government
The West Bengal Governor has agreed to fill up six vacancies of Vice Chancellors by appointing candidates out of the list recommended by the West Bengal Government. Attorney General for India R Venkataramani informed the Supreme Court about the decision of the Governor (Chancellor of the Universities) on Tuesday (April 16).Taking note of the…

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Of Technical Assistants As Assistant Engineers In TN PWD
While upholding the decision of the Tamil Nadu Government to appoint Technical Assistants as Assistant Engineers in the Public Works Department, the Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 16) expressed displeasure over the attitude of the Association of Engineers in Tamil Nadu to grab all posts of Assistant Engineers in the State without leaving the posts…

IT Rules Amendment | FCU Not Mandated To Disclose Truth Despite Purported Purpose To Ensure Informed Citizenry: Kunal Kamra To Bombay High Court
On Tuesday the petitioners in a plea challenging the 2021 IT Rules Amendment submitted before the Bombay High Court that there is no provision for the government fact check unit (FCU) to fulfil its purported intent of keeping the citizens informed.“The ostensible purpose of the Rule is to ensure an informed citizenry. But the Rule doesn’t require…

‘You Can’t Insult Allopathy’ : Supreme Court To Baba Ramdev & Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna [Read Full Courtroom Exchange]
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 16) interacted with Patanjali Ayurved’s Managing Director (MD) Acharya Balakrishna and its co-founder Baba Ramdev in the contempt proceedings initiated against them over the publication of misleading medical advertisements despite undertaking given to the Court in November last year. The bench of Justices …

Plea For 100% EVM-VVPAT Verification : Human Intervention Creates Problems, Says Supreme Court During Hearing
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 16) heard petitions seeking complete verification of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) against Voter-Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) records.After hearing the matter for over two hours, the bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta posted the matter on April 18 for further hearing….

Supreme Court Seeks States’ Responses On Steps Taken In Mob Lynching Cases
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 16) directed the States, which have not yet responded to the public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW) regarding the increase in mob lynching incidents, to file detailed affidavits specifying the steps taken by them in respect the mob-lynching incidents mentioned in…

Baba Ramdev & Acharya Balkrishna Personally Apologise To Supreme Court, Patanjali Ltd Agrees To Publish Public Apology
Baba Ramdev, co-founder of Patanjali Ayurved Ltd, personally appeared before the Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 16) and expressed unconditional apology for publishing misleading advertisements and making comments against Allopathic medicines in breach of an undertaking given to the Court.Acharya Balkrishna, the Managing Director of Patanjali, also…

Plea For 100% VVPAT Verification Of EVM Votes : Live Updates From Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will hear today petitions seeking 100% verification of EVM votes with VVPAT slips.A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta will hear the petitions filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms and others.Responding to the petition filed by ADR, the Election Commission of India had cited practical difficulties…

‘UGC Regulations Binding On Universities’ : Supreme Court Directs Regularization Of Teachers At Jamia Milia Islamia
Observing that the University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations are binding on the Universities, the Supreme Court on Monday (April 15) directed the reinstatement of the teachers at Jamia Milia Islamia (“University”) on a permanent basis who were denied regularization by the University even after UGC’s letter to University directing…

Contempt Case Against Patanjali, Baba Ramdev : Live Updates From Supreme Court
The Supreme Court will hear today the contempt case against Patanjali Ayurved, its MD Acharya Balkrishna & Baba Ramdev for publishing misleading medical advertisements.On the previous hearing date, the Court had rejected the second apology tendered by Patanjali. The Court also noted that Balkrishna and Ramdev had sworn an affidavit with…

https://egazette.gov.in/(S(yjdlmducidxyab0n4xweogkq))/ViewPDF.aspx